回复：‘宝刀屠龙 发表评论于 2026-02-08 18:33:09
五毛们又在造谣了，这里是黎智英的访谈原话
“If we think that we’re starting a cold war with China today, a cold war that’s a war of competing values, and we’re on your side sacrificing our life, our freedom, everything we have, fighting this war in the frontier for you…should you support us? This is something that America has to know, not only supporting us, but use your moral authority in this cold war to win this war in the beginning because they have nothing. It’s like they are going to the battle without any weapon, and you have the nuclear weapon. You can finish them in a minute.”
涉及核武的具体内容是这样的
“美国人必须清楚一点，(美国)不应仅仅是支持我们，而是在这场冷战开始之初，就使用你们手中的道德武器对他们一击即溃，因为他们在(道德)上一无所有。这就像战场上你手里拥有核武而它们手无寸铁，你能在一分钟内结束战斗“
五毛们如果不懂英文，我这里给你们翻译了，如果担心我的翻译夹带私货，可以自己查字典翻译。
黎智英的发言用词非常明确，核武只是个比喻，强调的是美国有价值观优势，应该加以利用，对中共予以一击即中的打击，而不是真的用核武器physically destroy中国’
回复：‘宝刀屠龙 发表评论于 2026-02-08 18:33:09
五毛们又在造谣了，这里是黎智英的访谈原话
“If we think that we’re starting a cold war with China today, a cold war that’s a war of competing values, and we’re on your side sacrificing our life, our freedom, everything we have, fighting this war in the frontier for you…should you support us? This is something that America has to know, not only supporting us, but use your moral authority in this cold war to win this war in the beginning because they have nothing. It’s like they are going to the battle without any weapon, and you have the nuclear weapon. You can finish them in a minute.”
涉及核武的具体内容是这样的
“美国人必须清楚一点，(美国)不应仅仅是支持我们，而是在这场冷战开始之初，就使用你们手中的道德武器对他们一击即溃，因为他们在(道德)上一无所有。这就像战场上你手里拥有核武而它们手无寸铁，你能在一分钟内结束战斗“
五毛们如果不懂英文，我这里给你们翻译了，如果担心我的翻译夹带私货，可以自己查字典翻译。
黎智英的发言用词非常明确，核武只是个比喻，强调的是美国有价值观优势，应该加以利用，对中共予以一击即中的打击，而不是真的用核武器physically destroy中国’
五毛们又在造谣了，这里是黎智英的访谈原话
“If we think that we’re starting a cold war with China today, a cold war that’s a war of competing values, and we’re on your side sacrificing our life, our freedom, everything we have, fighting this war in the frontier for you…should you support us? This is something that America has to know, not only supporting us, but use your moral authority in this cold war to win this war in the beginning because they have nothing. It’s like they are going to the battle without any weapon, and you have the nuclear weapon. You can finish them in a minute.”
涉及核武的具体内容是这样的
“美国人必须清楚一点，(美国)不应仅仅是支持我们，而是在这场冷战开始之初，就使用你们手中的道德武器对他们一击即溃，因为他们在(道德)上一无所有。这就像战场上你手里拥有核武而它们手无寸铁，你能在一分钟内结束战斗“
五毛们如果不懂英文，我这里给你们翻译了，如果担心我的翻译夹带私货，可以自己查字典翻译。
黎智英的发言用词非常明确，核武只是个比喻，强调的是美国有价值观优势，应该加以利用，对中共予以一击即中的打击，而不是真的用核武器physically destroy中国
五毛们又在造谣了，这里是黎智英的访谈原话
“If we think that we’re starting a cold war with China today, a cold war that’s a war of competing values, and we’re on your side sacrificing our life, our freedom, everything we have, fighting this war in the frontier for you…should you support us? This is something that America has to know, not only supporting us, but use your moral authority in this cold war to win this war in the beginning because they have nothing. It’s like they are going to the battle without any weapon, and you have the nuclear weapon. You can finish them in a minute.”
涉及核武的具体内容是这样的
“美国人必须清楚一点，(美国)不应仅仅是支持我们，而是在这场冷战开始之初，就使用你们手中的道德武器对他们一击即溃，因为他们在(道德)上一无所有。这就像战场上你手里拥有核武而它们手无寸铁，你能在一分钟内结束战斗“
五毛们如果不懂英文，我这里给你们翻译了，如果担心我的翻译夹带私货，可以自己查字典翻译。
黎智英的发言用词非常明确，核武只是个比喻，强调的是美国有价值观优势，应该加以利用，对中共予以一击即中的打击，而不是真的用核武器physically destroy中国’
**================**
首先， 狗粮的浅薄英文水平就不要臭显了， 一个赤裸裸需要美国来干涉中国的内奸本身不得好死， 明摆着说自己为了美国的价值观打前线， 美国要为狗来撑腰， 另外，既然有核武， 未尝一试？ 你他妈的还有脸洗地？ 这种吃里扒外的烂货， 就这两条就该关一辈子， 美国发生的任何一场骚乱， 如果有人说中共在背后支持，你认为美国会怎样？ 你的双标思维暴露了你这条双标狗的德行