The U.S. Supreme Court’s Tuesday decision against Donald Trump’s deployment of the National Guard in Illinois had the “unintended consequence” of potentially pushing the president to deploy active-duty military units instead, legal scholar John Yoo, who previously clerked for conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, said Wednesday.
“The unintended consequence here might be that the president is going to have to call the 82nd Airborne, or the Marines, or the 101st Airborne Division, as, for example, President Eisenhower did, after Brown v. Board of Education in the South to enforce desegregation,” Yoo, the Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley, said in an interview with Fox News.
“President Trump might have to do that first, in order to protect those federal buildings, those ice agents, and then, if they fail, he can then call out the National Guard,” he said.
huih 发表评论于 2025-12-24 19:37:31
John Yoo从小布什时期就在司法部工作，做到助理司法部长，曾是共和党参议院司法委员会的general counsel, 罗姆尼竞选总统的法律顾问。本人哈佛本科耶鲁法学院，大法官Thomas的clerk，多个大学法学院教授，是共和党重要的法律学者之一。下面帖是他今天在Fox采访讲的原话。他一贯发言比较谨慎，听到他这么说还是有点吃惊。难道Trump真要上Marine？
判决书的第一到第三页总结了法院判决的理由
1. 川普依赖美国法律10 U. S. C. §12406(3)，调动伊利诺伊州和德州的国民警卫队到芝加哥。该法条规定，如果总统“无法依靠常规部队执行美国法律。”“unable with the regular
forces to execute the laws of the United States.” 才可以调动国民警卫队。川普说常规部队包括ICE，最高法院说这不对。
2. 这是不是说以后总统就可以经常调动常规部队国内执法？ 不是的。最高法院判决书里解释了， 调动常规部队国内执法必须有宪法和国会法律的依据， Under the Posse
Comitatus Act, the military is prohibited from “execut[ing]
the laws” “except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress.”
18 U. S. C. §1385. So before the President can federalize
the Guard under §12406(3), he likely must have statutory
or constitutional authority to execute the laws with the regular military and must be “unable” with those forces to perform that function.
HOLY CRAP ????Democrats may have just handed President Donald Trump a MASSIVE opening
By dragging this fight to Supreme Court of the United States they triggered a nuclear backfire
Legal experts are already spelling it out
The unintended consequence is that POTUS can deploy federal forces just like Dwight D. Eisenhower did after Brown v Board
First step
Protect federal buildings
Protect ICE agents
If local and state officials refuse to do their jobs
Federal authority steps in
That means Marines
Airborne units
Real enforcement
Only AFTER that would the National Guard even be needed
Democrats thought they were blocking Trump
Instead they may have just unlocked his full constitutional authority
这楼里同一个rhetoric说来说去，胡搅什么州权，了解这个案子背景再说。ICE的芝加哥执法，遭遇leftist阻挡，冲击ICE facility，需要当地警方配合。IL州长和芝加哥市长公开表示不配合ICE执法。Trump说要派national guard，被告一路到高法。高法dissent but on narrow ground. 司法部已经提告IL州不配合联邦移民执法。看professor John Yoo的解释，POTUS可以先用military force。好奇Trump会走这一步吗。
刚听到的UCB law professor John Yoo的解释，高法判决是“President has to be unable to force the law by regular forces".
”The unintended consequence here might be POTUS has to call the 82nd Airborne, or the Marines, or the 101st Airborne Division, like President Eisenhower did after Brown v Board."
"Trump might have to do that first to protect federal buildings and ICE agents. THEN, if they fail, he can then call out the National Guard."
“特朗普样样都要学独裁国家”？独裁国家国家有什么要学的。独裁国家有这样的三权分离司法监督吗？“美国各州有自己的solvereignty”，但不能庇护非法移民影响其他的州。高法的判决是narrow ground，仅指现在的national guard派遣方式不合法，而且Trump还没实施呢。移民法是联邦法，联邦政府有各种方式deplore federal law enforcement。政治舆论上，对Trump是好事。芝加哥人民选的市长州长为党派利益站在非法移民一边，不惜和联邦政府打官司，选民自己去想吧。IL州长2028估计也想选总统，呵呵。
