The Second Amendment reads, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
A. What is a gun?
A tool specifically designed to kill people in high efficiency.
B. What is the difference between advocacy of gun right and advocacy of gun violence?
The possession of a gun enables occurrence of gun violence. And, it necessitates the possession of a gun to fulfill gun violence.
Therefore, gun right is the sufficient and necessary condition of gun violence. In other words, advocacy of gun right = advocacy of gun violence.
C. Victims of gun violence deserve condolence in general. What if a victim was an advocate of gun violence before he became a victim?
诚信 发表评论于 2025-09-16 08:21:43
@风静水清:
Your response is feeble and fragile.
(1) "第二修正案是针对暴政的，但查理柯克不是公职政府官员。" Are you suggesting that political violence can be aimed at 公职政府官员, at least, Trump or other US Presidents can be targeted violently, if they are alleged to be tyrants?
My answer is: NO!
My real point is that 2nd amendment is quite antiquated. need to be carefully construed, and hence cannot be so broadly advocated and invoked as Kirk himself did. He proved he was fatally wrong with his own life on this issue.
(2) "难道支持川普就该被杀吗？" First, Charlie is extensively seen and called "an ally" of Trump, not a supporter. Your assumption is wrong here. More important, you misunderstood or distorted my argument. My originally message never indicates Kirk 该被杀. It is all about his advocacy of gun right and gun violence, despite the cumbersome cost, which ultimately claimed his own life.
(3) Your assumption and conclusion that "你看来是个崇尚暴力的人" is totally illogical and wrong. Instead, I condemn, oppose and try to preempt any political violence. Obviously, you are far from capable of debating with me. Remember, digression is a sign of concession. Don't deviate.
Conclusion: It is exorbitant stupidity and ignorance that spawn fanatic allegiance to Trump.
硅谷工匠 发表评论于 2025-09-16 07:16:08
He can not be alone. It would be hard to get onto the roof alone. They are typically locked shut. He must have a lot of help from the Trans people.
Exercising second amendment right is fine. But celebrating a killing is weird.
第二修正案是针对暴政的，但查理柯克不是公职政府官员。先勿论川普是否为暴君，难道支持川普就该被杀吗？支持川普的美囯人有几千万，你认为都该杀？！你看来是个崇尚暴力的人。下面用J.k. Rowling(哈利波特作者）9/13在推特发表的文字来告诉大家如何区别几类人：“If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you’re illiberal. If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you’re a fundamentalist. If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you’re a totalitarian. If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you’re a terrorist”。
What if Tyler Robinson claims that he exerted his 2nd amendment right to resist tyranny by assassinating Charlie Kirk?
He might assert that Trump is a tyrant, because he exercises dictatorship in tackling many political, economic, military and diplomatic issues, especially on undocumented immigrants, and Charlie Kirk strenuously advocated Trump's agenda.
I have posted this debatable question numerous times following both news and blog articles, but no Trump supporter is capable of refuting, nor even responding. Indeed, exorbitant stupidity and ignorance spawn fanatic support for Trump.
